top of page
Writer's pictureOne Viral

New parliament building: India opposition boycott casts shadow on inauguration



The inauguration of India's new parliament building on Monday was overshadowed by a boycott by the opposition, who have accused the government of corruption and undemocratic practices.

The new building, which is located in the heart of New Delhi, is a vast complex that will house both houses of parliament. It is the largest and most expensive parliament building in the world, with a total cost of over ₹20,000 crore (US$2.6 billion).

The opposition has accused the government of spending lavishly on the new building while ignoring the needs of the poor and the middle class. They have also alleged that the government has bypassed parliamentary procedures in the construction of the building.

In a statement, the opposition said that the boycott was "a mark of protest against the government's undemocratic and corrupt practices". They said that the new parliament building was a "symbol of the government's arrogance and disregard for the people".

The government has defended the construction of the new parliament building, saying that it is necessary to meet the growing needs of the legislature. They have also denied the allegations of corruption and undemocratic practices.

The inauguration ceremony was attended by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, President Ram Nath Kovind, and other senior government officials. However, the opposition leaders were conspicuous by their absence.

The boycott of the inauguration ceremony is a major setback for the government. It is a sign that the opposition is united in its opposition to the government and its policies. It is also a reminder that the government is not invincible and that it can be challenged.

The new parliament building is a symbol of the government's ambition and its desire to project itself as a modern and progressive nation. However, the boycott of the inauguration ceremony is a reminder that the government is not above criticism and that it must be held accountable for its actions.

5 views0 comments

Comments


bottom of page